Call to Order

Transcript (~1 min @ 1:28:32)

Speakers identified by voice; unnamed voices are numbered within this recording. Auto-caption text — verify against the video.

▶ 1:28:17 Speaker 5: That's a very good question, and the answer to that is no, which is hugely to your advantage. It's very rare, for example, if only 20, for some reason, like everybody decided to opt out, you'd be able to move forward if only 20% of your residents decided to go for it. Okay. So that's usually to your advantage, and it's something that's not been picked up on by the winning suppliers yet.

▶ 1:28:35 Speaker 4: Okay, thank you.

▶ 1:28:37 Peter D. Mortimer: That's a thank you. Thank you, Alderman Lemmerman. Regrettably, once again, we had another committee that was posted for 8 o'clock. And the half hour that's required by law, and by the orders of this committee, require us to, once again, take a recess to briefly open the committee. Have public participation, and probably at the will of the chair of that committee, Alderman Wright, send it right into recess. So I would welcome a motion to recess once again.

▶ 1:29:10 Speaker 11: Motion to recess.

▶ 1:29:11 Peter D. Mortimer: Second. a motion to recess by alderman boy cell duly seconded by alderman Byrd all in favor please say aye aye thank you we are in recess I'm not right I'm I'm all

▶ 1:29:34 John N. Tramontozzi: them in trim it tells you the chairman of the legal legislative committee he

▶ 1:29:45 John N. Tramontozzi: was last year you're right this is the legal and legislative committee of the Board of Aldermen of the city of Melrose I will entertain a motion to open for floor for public participation so moved so we have a motion by Alderman Byrd