ORDER-2017-106 : A transfer from Projected Debt Interest (017522-549100), in the amount of $7,850.73 to various Inspectional Services accounts as set forth within..

Transcript (~2 min @ 1:10)

Speakers identified by voice; unnamed voices are numbered within this recording. Auto-caption text — verify against the video.

▶ 1:00 Mary Beth McAteer-Margolis: closed. We have one order before us this evening. It's order 2017-106, a transfer from projected debt interest account 017522-549100 in the amount of $7,850.73 to various inspectional

▶ 1:27 Gail Infurna: services accounts motion to recommend set forth here in excuse me Alderman Boisselle moves to recommend Alderman Inferno has I'll second that for discussion um I see that there's no no other nothing from the inspectional services yes where it says it's set as it says set forth within I see nothing

▶ 1:48 Robert A. Boisselle: attached second page it's a breakout itemized deduct itemized items oh I'm

▶ 1:53 Gail Infurna: I'm sorry, I just thought that was going to be a repeat of the top line, I'm sorry. Order print out gives the breakdown of the expenses, which do in fact total $7,850. Thank you very much for that clarification.

▶ 2:07 Mary Beth McAteer-Margolis: President Khan.

▶ 2:07 Speaker 1: Yeah, before the final full board is taken, Madam Chairman, if you could find out why these accounts are all in need of, it's not a large amount of money, but why they're in need of money to be transferred in.

▶ 2:23 Mary Beth McAteer-Margolis: I in fact did speak with our building inspector Paul Johnson earlier and he advised me that over the summer they did need to bring in extra help for the inspectional professional services line the $4,000 that line was was not in his funded to that degree in his budget and they were very very busy with inspections Because they brought in over a million and a half dollars in inspection fees last year, and they needed some additional help. And I believe that overtime was for the same reason. The other expenses were incidentals that I'm not really sure why they weren't in the regular budget, but they were not. He did indicate as well that he would not be back to us, that this would see him through this fiscal year.

▶ 3:13 Speaker 1: Yeah, well, you anticipated my second question as I wanted to make sure that this would get them to the end of the fiscal year, thank you.

▶ 3:21 Mary Beth McAteer-Margolis: Is there anyone else, non-voting member, that has a question? So an order has, a motion has been made and seconded. All in favor? Aye. Opposed? That order will be recommended to the full board.

▶ 3:34 Speaker 1: Motion to adjourn.