Melrose Council Search

← Appropriations & Oversight Committee · 2023-06-15 · Appropriations and Oversight Budget Hearing

TRNSF-2023-7 : A transfer in the amount of $39,502.20 to the Legal Department (#151) from Veterans Benefits (account 015432-544000).

Passed · OUGHT TO PASS [9 TO 0] · moved by Shawn M. MacMaster, seconded by Jen Grigoraitis, President, Ex Oficio Yes: Leila Migliorelli, Maya Jamaleddine, Shawn M. MacMaster, Jack Eccles, Mark Garipay, Robb Stewart, Manjula Karamcheti, John Obremski, Jen Grigoraitis. Absent: Christopher Cinella, Ryan Williams.

Agenda original PDF

No further agenda text.

Minutes original PDF

TRNSF-2023-7 Transfer City of Melrose Page 2 9/1/2023 1:17 PM Minutes Appropriations & Oversight Committee June 15, 2023 A transfer in the amount of $39,502.20 to the Legal Department (#151) from Veterans Benefits (account 015432-544000). Ought to pass City Council

All documents for this meeting on the city portal

Transcript (~7 min @ 3:01:20)

Speakers identified by voice; unnamed voices are numbered within this recording. Auto-caption text — verify against the video.

▶ 3:00:41 Speaker 9: there. 2023 dash six again, uh, his, uh, uh, friend in its own way, um, looking for a transfer, Mr. Han for Medicare. 48,000 apportion from temporary debt and apportion from veteran services. And again, that's not to discount services, but the, we do have an allocation every year to pay for expenses for veterans. And when you don't, and we set up a threshold and when that available funds are available, they're available. No different than temporary debt where the make, uh, there's an estimate made on the cost for debt and if there's extra money, we can use that to transfer. So that was again, for FY 23 for Medicare, that 48,000 is what we're looking for to close out 23. And last but not least, a good friend, um, again, um, looking for additional funds for legal department, uh, Shannon, a total of 39,000 5 0 2 20. She gave a nice outline, I think in her May 24th letter to the mayor for, for transfer of funds. Typically, um, we see the property and casualty, given the timing, um, when we set the budget, I believe she set it at a 5% increase. And as she explains here, that came in higher than that. And therefore, additional, um, funds of 31700.2 is needed to just for that particular item alone as well as $802 again for endorsements for city vehicles that came in. This is, this happens can candidly, every year vehicles come in and out and you have to cover them appropriately with insurance. So you can't always time that. And obviously you would never know when the vehicle was gonna come in and out as you start a fiscal year unless there was some other planning done ahead of time. And the last, her request is $7,000 for expenses relative to, um, arbitration and potential legal fees that she anticipates. Um, she's gonna need the money for it prior to the end of the year to pay those obligations. So that's why we're, she's asking, um, for the 39,000 502 20 and again from veterans benefits, um, we, we have available funds that we did not have to expend. Um, so for those other ones, a clear, and again, on 2 0 2 3 dash two with the um, MAC Senior grant, obviously I could reach out to Denise and get more information for the city council. If you, in that sense, whatever you choose to do, I'd be happy to do.

▶ 3:03:18 Jen Grigoraitis: Thank you. I mean, we have a memo. She, it says it's for FY 24. I just, if, if you're comfortable with that. Um, it just seems like an atypical way to fund next year. Thank you. Thank you Madam Chair.

▶ 3:03:29 Speaker 9: Thank you. Any questions? Um, again, um, it, it, it's necessary and, um, it, it allows us to keep everyone in line and everyone in check, including myself cuz my, my department and, uh, so that everything is order at the end of the year. And I can feel good that the reports you get at year end and we begin 24, you're not gonna have any situations that ended in a deficit. You don't want that. You want everyone to be clean so you, you start fresh for the new year. That's what this is really all about.

▶ 3:04:01 Speaker 4: Thank you. Yeah. Any other questions from counselors, councilor McMaster?

▶ 3:04:08 Shawn M. MacMaster: Uh, yes. Uh, Madam Chair, uh, based on, uh, Mr. Dela Russo's, uh, summary in the fact that these are all interdepartmental transfers of money that's already budgeted for, uh, and, uh, the current fiscal year, I would make a motion at this time to conjoin transfer. 2023 dash 1 20 23 dash 2 20 23 dash 3 20 23 dash 4 20 23 dash 5, 20 23 dash six and 2023 dash seven second.

▶ 3:04:41 Speaker 4: Motion to conjoin, um, transfer orders 2022 dash 3 20 23 dash one, um, through 2023 dash seven made by Councilor McMaster. Seconded by Councilor Stewart. Um, anyone on discussion?

▶ 3:05:03 Leila Migliorelli: No. I actually have one question. I just wanna ba I think you President GRE for calling that memo to the, my, uh, the council's attention. Um, I agree that it's pretty, pretty clearly stated here that this mm-hmm. Messina fund is, um, being brought up to 20,000 for FY 24. Um, and I, I guess if I, what if it's not, if, if we, if you do not have the list of grantees for FY 24 now, what kind of paperwork would you anticipate receiving to encumber this money for FY 24?

▶ 3:05:44 Speaker 9: Um, I honestly would've to check with, uh, Ms. Gaffey to see what she has. Okay. Because she's also indicates that funds will address this shortfall and allow even more worthwhile projects to receive funds, which, uh, may indicate that there are projects in the queue that if this is approved, it can be supported.

▶ 3:06:02 Speaker 4: Yeah, it, yeah, it's a little unclear to me. Yeah. Um,

▶ 3:06:06 Speaker 9: I'd be happy to get clarification for the city council

▶ 3:06:11 Speaker 4: Councilor McMaster, would you be, I mean, do we, we have this motion on the table. I don't know if there's a way to remove that one and hold it

▶ 3:06:18 Speaker 10: For I, I, I'd be happy to withdraw the motion if, if, um, yes. Council, let's do it. Withdraw as a second. Okay.

▶ 3:06:24 Speaker 1: I'll withdraw my second. Thank you. Um, motion.

▶ 3:06:28 Speaker 4: Do you want a motion again to conjoin the other ones then?

▶ 3:06:31 Speaker 10: So, um, with the exception of, uh, number two, correct. 2023 dash two? Mm-hmm. Yeah. Uh, so at this time, uh, Madam Chair, I would make a motion to, uh, conjoin orders 2023 dash 1 20 23 dash 3 20 23 dash 4 20 23 dash 5, 20 23 dash six, and 2023 dash seven.

▶ 3:06:54 Speaker 1: Mme. Charles, second, the motion.

▶ 3:06:55 Leila Migliorelli: Okay. Um, councilor McMaster is motioning to conjoin orders 2023 dash one dash three dash four dash five dash six and dash seven. And seconded by Councilor Stewart On discussion,

▶ 3:07:12 Speaker 4: seeing none. Um, Mr. Que, please call the role

▶ 3:07:15 Speaker 1: Vice chair Jamal Dean? Yes. Councilor McMaster? Yes. Councilor Eccles? Yes. Councilor Repe? Yes. Councilor Stewart? Yes. Councilor Chetty? Yes. Councilor Broski? Yes. Present Es? Yes. And Chair Elli? Yes. That's nine? Yes.

▶ 3:07:35 Speaker 4: Okay. So these orders are now conjoined. What is the will of the committee on the conjoined orders.

▶ 3:07:41 Speaker 10: Madam Chair, at this, uh, time, I would make, uh, a motion to recommend, uh, as conjoined

▶ 3:07:49 Leila Migliorelli: Second motion to recommend as conjoined made by Councilor McMaster. Seconded by President Grigoraitis. Um, anyone on discussion? Seeing none, Mr. Clerk, will you please call the roll

▶ 3:08:01 Speaker 1: Vice chair Jamal Dean? Yes. Councilor McMaster? Yes. Councillor Eccles? Yes. Councilor gpe? Yes. Councilor Stewart? Yes. Councilor Crime Shady? Yes. Councilor Abramsky? Yes. President G? Yes. And chair mg? Yes. That's nine. Yes. Unanim.

▶ 3:08:21 Leila Migliorelli: Thank you. That, um, motion order passes, um, and will be sent to the full counsel on Tuesday.

▶ 3:08:29 Speaker 4: Um, next up you have to dispose of the transfer or deal with the transfer. 2023 dash two. What is the will of the committee?