APPT-2024-12 : Reappointment of Gregory Sampson, 30 Morgan St., to the Planning Board for a five-year term; said term to expire on the last day of February 2028

Transcript (~2 min @ 3:58)

Speakers identified by voice; unnamed voices are numbered within this recording. Auto-caption text — verify against the video.

▶ 3:55 Mark Garipay: For the record, we have Vice Chair Stewart is with us tonight. Thank you.

▶ 4:02 Speaker 5: It's good to be here.

▶ 4:04 Mark Garipay: Appointment 2024 dash 12 The reappointment of Gregory Sampson, 30 Morgan Street to the Planning Board for a five year term. Said term due expire on the last day of February, 2028.

▶ 4:16 Speaker 1: What is the role of the committee?

▶ 4:18 Speaker 4: Motion to recommend for passage. Second.

▶ 4:22 Mark Garipay: Motion to recommend for passage made by President Grigoraitis. Seconded by Council Melli on discussion.

▶ 4:31 Leila Migliorelli: Can I do a point of order just looking at some of these, they saying five year terms, but they're not all ending five years from now. I just want to make sure we're consistent with how we're recording this

▶ 4:42 Speaker 2: Mr. Chair.

▶ 4:44 Speaker 1: Um, I will

▶ 4:47 Mark Garipay: have to go get a, get a an appointment, get a ruling from, uh, Ms.

▶ 4:53 Speaker 1: Gaffey on that. I can help. Okay. If you wanna I vote.

▶ 4:55 Speaker 2: Motion to suspend the rules.

▶ 4:56 Mark Garipay: We have a motion to suspend the rules. Second. Seconded by co motion to suspend the rules by Council Melli seconded by

▶ 5:05 Speaker 1: Councilor Stewart on discussion. All in favor? Aye. Aye. Opposed? The rules are now suspended. Mr. Mayor,

▶ 5:10 Paul Brodeur: Appreciate the question. Happy? Happy. I was in the neighborhood. Um, so the, um, we had to do this once before in the recent past where some appointments Oh, actually, yeah. A good example would be on the park commission when we re-upped some of the park commission members where, um, there have been significant delays and the, um, terms need to be staggered so that there is no wholesale turnover. So these basically track back as best we could to original appointment dates and that you'll see the, the, the difference of their, they're almost like five years retro. Okay. To the last appointment date. They could also be thought of as, you know, as a three year staggered term.

▶ 5:53 Leila Migliorelli: So it's correct to say five year term and the end date. It's a, it's, this is not like a Clerical error. Correct. This is,

▶ 5:58 Speaker 6: that's what I just wanted to clarify to make sure this may be an error, but it's not a clerical error. Sure. You alright? Right. Thank you.

▶ 6:05 Mark Garipay: Thank you Mr. Maya. Of course. Um, so we have a motion on the floor for re um,

▶ 6:12 Mark Garipay: for the passage of appointment 2024 dash 12, um, on discussion. All in favor?

▶ 6:19 Speaker 3: Aye. Aye. Opposed?

▶ 6:22 Speaker 1: That order will go before we'll get recommended to the full counsel