Melrose Council Search

← City Council · 2016-05-02 · City Council Regular Meeting

ORDER-2016-178 : Transfer of $5,000.00 from Workers Comp. Acct. #019122-543102 to Municipal Building Repair, Acct. #014022-527700

Passed · TABLED [7 TO 0] · moved by Monica C. Medeiros, Alderman at Large, seconded by Peter D. Mortimer, Ward 6 Alderman Yes: Robert A. Boisselle, Scott M. Forbes, Jennifer L. Lemmerman, Monica C. Medeiros, Peter D. Mortimer, John N. Tramontozzi, Donald L. Conn Jr.. Absent: Gail Infurna, Mary Beth McAteer-Margolis.

Agenda original PDF

No further agenda text.

Minutes original PDF

ORDER-2016-178 Divided Order - Transfer Transfer of $5,000.00 from Workers Comp. Acct. #019122-543102 to Municipal Building Repair, Acct. #014022-527700 Tabled Board of Aldermen City of Melrose Page 7 6/3/2016 7:39 PM

All documents for this meeting on the city portal

Transcript (~2 min @ 1:22:46)

Speakers identified by voice; unnamed voices are numbered within this recording. Auto-caption text — verify against the video.

▶ 1:22:31 Speaker 1: alderman forbes is seeking to divide the order to remove uh the five thousand dollar appropriation from the order that is a privilege motion which is passed upon being made and does not call for a vote the orders are divided the order the appropriation that was carved out will be assigned order number 2016-178 most of the passage mr president second

▶ 1:23:00 Speaker 1: you're moving for passage of two 2016 148 or 2016. uh a motion for passage on order number

▶ 1:23:06 Scott M. Forbes: 2016-178 mr president no no okay all right one four i'm sorry well that's fine if that's the

▶ 1:23:15 Speaker 1: motion that the alderman has made is there a second

▶ 1:23:24 Speaker 1: Is there a second to the motion for passage? Second. Motion is seconded by Alderman Tramontozzi. The Order 2016-178 is before you. Alderman Medeiros.

▶ 1:23:36 Monica C. Medeiros: Based upon our rules, Mr. President, since this is a new order as a transfer and appropriation, I don't believe we can act on it tonight. It would have to go to a subsequent —

▶ 1:23:47 Speaker 1: It's not a new order. It's now a divided order. Divided order. divided order is not a new order so it would be the ruling of the chair that this order does not have to be referred to committee okay great and then do we

▶ 1:24:02 Speaker 1: need eight votes mr. president we do need eight votes for passage of that or

▶ 1:24:06 Monica C. Medeiros: at that order so at this time I might suggest that we table this because I

▶ 1:24:15 Speaker 1: don't think we have eight Alderman present are you making a motion to table

▶ 1:24:17 Monica C. Medeiros: the order I think there's already a motion for passage on the floor but if If it would be in order to table the motion, then I would make that motion.

▶ 1:24:24 Speaker 1: Well, that would have to be contingent upon the makers of the motion to withdraw the motion and the second.

▶ 1:24:30 Scott M. Forbes: Is there, I'm looking before the room, and I understand the eight aldermen that need to be present, so I'll withdraw my motion.

▶ 1:24:39 Speaker 1: I withdraw the second. Motion and second, I withdraw, and the order is before you. I believe Alderman Medeiros is making a motion to lay this order on the table. Second. Motion is seconded by Alderman Mortimer. Motion to table is non-debatable. All those in favor of the motion to table, please indicate by saying aye. Aye. Anyone opposed? That order will be laid on the table. So we are back to order 2016-148.