← Appropriations & Oversight Committee · 2015-08-24 · Appropriations and Oversight Committee Meeting
ORDER-2016-20 : An Appropriation in the amount of $57,887.36 from Raised and Appropriated to various accounts as set forth within
Agenda original PDF
Minutes original PDF
ORDER-2016-20 Appropriation An Appropriation in the amount of $57,887.36 from Raised and Appropriated to various accounts as set forth within Recommend Passage Board of Aldermen City of Melrose Page 1 Updated 8/26/2015 10:44 AM
Transcript
▶ 18:48 Peter D. Mortimer: Seeing none, all in favor of the motion to recommend this order for passage, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Hearing none, this order will be recommended for passage at our next full bid board meeting at the Monday meeting in September.
▶ 19:05 Peter D. Mortimer: Thank you very much. And now we will proceed to the next order. It is order 2016-20. It is an appropriation in the amount of $57,887.36 from raised and appropriated to various accounts as set forth herein. We are now also joined, sitting to Mr. Delo Russo's right, Mrs. Mary Ann Long, our Director of Personnel, Human Resources. Personnel, you can tell I grew up in the 80s, we don't say personnel anymore. So our Director of Human Resources, Mary Ann Long. I guess you wouldn't grow up in the 80s.
▶ 19:52 Speaker 11: I think he's using some poetic license.
▶ 19:58 Speaker 3: I'm getting kind of catty there.
▶ 20:01 Peter D. Mortimer: Would you like to make an opening statement, please?
▶ 20:06 Speaker 11: Yes, I would. These, there are four adjustments applicable here to the Pine Banks Park. They had adjustments in the personnel as well as equipment. And this is being reflected in this request this evening. I'll ask that Marion long addresses the personnel issues and then I'd be happy to address the capital equipment matter as well as you know the Pine Banks Park
▶ 20:36 Speaker 9: staff are shared are actually leased by the trustees of the Pine Banks through a legal contract and agreement and the costs are shared by the city of Melrose and the city of Malden. And our superintendent of Pine Banks, who has actually been in the Pine Bank staff for 27 years, is retiring on December 31st. So the amount that you see in the first line, in the amount of $23,875, is related to his retirement. And that includes the vacation time that he currently has accrued now he's he's here and not leaving for four months but we had to use today's figures we don't know whether or not he will be using vacation time so that's approximately 5,500 and when an employee has been employed for 20 years or more and then retires it's very specific they can the city will buy back up to four thousand dollars of their sick leave accruals and again we don't know whether or not he will use any sick time between now and December 31st this is the maximum amount that we're asking for and the board of trustees is also um paying out fifteen thousand dollars um to the superintendent for his um in recognition of his years of service and also his family's years of service you may know his father was the superintendent before him for many many years and our current superintendent was a staff member again this amount will be transferred into the pine bank's budget currently and then what my office does is we invoice the city of malden on a quarterly basis and those quarterly invoices include salary obviously any type of compensation for the four regular employees as well as the temporary employees you know seasonal employees and their benefits health insurance etc so although we're transferring this amount into pine banks we will be um reimbursed by the city of malden for half of it approximately twelve thousand dollars president khan please um
▶ 23:32 Speaker 12: um this this gentleman was not a union member is that correct no non-union and just a point of interest is are these payments made pursuant to a policy of the city of Melrose or a policy
▶ 23:47 Speaker 9: of the city of Malden um they're a city of Melrose policy and um when this particular staff uh Pine staff actually transferred for many years they were managed by the city of Malden and then now it's our turn to manage them so they're the benefits that they had in Malden transferred with them as long as the city of Melrose had similar so they were in actually entitled to these benefits in Malden as well is what I was saying but this is in accordance with our employment manual to
▶ 24:24 Speaker 12: answer your question and and for anybody watching at home the 23 875 only half of that is the responsibility of melrose that is correct i know it's already been said and i know i always crack people for being redundant but i think it's important for people to know that our contribution
▶ 24:42 Peter D. Mortimer: is half that is correct that's all thank you president khan seeing no one else uh wishing to be heard i don't think we've had a motion yet have we madam clerk on this one point of order
▶ 24:58 Peter D. Mortimer: oh you okay you wish to go over some of the other items on the list anybody okay all right any
▶ 25:09 Speaker 11: further discussion mr delarusso please um the pine bank's capital equipment twelve thousand nine thirty eight fifty that's in addition to the ten thousand dollars that we placed in the budget for a placeholder at the time prior to them submitting the budget we did not know the cost of the equipment they purchased a chevrolet dump truck in a plow and that's the remainder of our share of
▶ 25:34 Peter D. Mortimer: that cost thank you mr belarusso alderman boys help please we're putting in twenty three thousand
▶ 25:40 Robert A. Boisselle: eight hundred and seventy five dollars and we're getting back twelve thousand correct approximate
▶ 25:46 Speaker 9: half whatever it is that um is the final expense we will receive a reimbursement for half of that
▶ 25:56 Robert A. Boisselle: amount from the city of malden we have capital equipment for twelve thousand nine hundred thirty eight dollars is that our portion or are we going to get half of that back um what happens is the
▶ 26:05 Speaker 11: vehicle costs forty five thousand eight hundred and seventy seven dollars so our half is twenty $22,938.50, so we don't get that back, that's our 50% share.
▶ 26:19 Robert A. Boisselle: Okay, so if we're getting 12,000 back, why don't we just put in $938 and just call it clean?
▶ 26:26 Speaker 2: Is it a nightmare in accounting to do this, or?
▶ 26:32 Speaker 2: Yes, yes. Okay, thank you, Mr. Chairman.
▶ 26:34 Peter D. Mortimer: Thank you, Alderman Boycelle. Alderman Medeiros, please.
▶ 26:38 Monica C. Medeiros: Thank you. Thank you. Also, Del Rosso, could you speak to a little bit about how we happen to have the funds available and raised and appropriated?
▶ 26:47 Speaker 11: Sure, two things. One is that we have reduced the health insurance budget by $100,000. We also have received over 30,000 more in state aid from the time I submitted this budget to the board.
▶ 27:05 Monica C. Medeiros: And is that in general state aid, or is that- Correct.
▶ 27:09 Speaker 3: Okay, thank you. Thank you, Alderman Medeiros.
▶ 27:13 Peter D. Mortimer: Alderman McAteer, my goal is please.
▶ 27:17 Mary Beth McAteer-Margolis: Thank you, I think Ms. Long, you probably covered the other Pine Bank salaries and wages more or less, it's the same procedure where we're covering those, and that's our share of the cost.
▶ 27:31 Speaker 6: She's referring to this. Salary, part time, and wages. Is that part of this?
▶ 27:35 Speaker 9: That's part of that. Yes. It is. So those are our share. Just wanted to clarify, yes.
▶ 27:39 Mary Beth McAteer-Margolis: That's our share. It's not, we're not being reimbursed for half of those.
▶ 27:44 Speaker 9: will be reimbursed for whatever the final amount is by half okay yes so this
▶ 27:50 Mary Beth McAteer-Margolis: was in addition to whatever we had already budgeted correct okay thank you and mr. de la Rousseau thank you I believe you've added been able to add back the animal sheltering piece in the Health Department yes so thank you we
▶ 28:13 Speaker 11: appreciate that I promise I would address it and hopefully this if it
▶ 28:18 Mary Beth McAteer-Margolis: passes that's been addressed and as far as the library salaries that was unexpected the overtime just no quite frankly that through the chair that's to
▶ 28:26 Speaker 11: meet the municipal appropriation requirement it should have been 15,000 in the budget and it was not it was originally and then it was changed so now that we that brings us back to base one where we belong for the library
▶ 28:45 Mary Beth McAteer-Margolis: period so it's it's not actually for overtime salary it's just going into
▶ 28:53 Speaker 11: that line or no it's going for that line if you look in the library budget you will see that that second line was was adjusted this brings it back to make it
▶ 29:03 Mary Beth McAteer-Margolis: whole again where it belonged to meet the state requirement correct okay thank Thank you, thank you, Mr. Chairman.
▶ 29:08 Peter D. Mortimer: Thank you, Alderman McAteer-Margolis.
▶ 29:15 Peter D. Mortimer: Any other questions, or would you like to address any other items on the list?
▶ 29:18 Mary Beth McAteer-Margolis: I'm going to make a motion to recommend.
▶ 29:20 Peter D. Mortimer: Okay, we have a motion to recommend this order for passage from Alderman McAteer-Margolis. Second. Duly seconded by Alderman Boisselle. He beat you by a half.
▶ 29:32 Speaker 3: Give me the peace sign there and got it in. Any further discussion?
▶ 29:37 Peter D. Mortimer: Seeing none, we're ready for the vote. favor of the motion to recommend the order for passage hi any opposed hearing none this order will be recommended to the full board for passage at our september meeting thank you very much you're welcome sir uh on a point of personal privilege we have alderman Medeiros thank you